May is Montana Time: Here is Clematis gracilifolia var. trifoliata (M. Johnson)

Posted by LindaB on Sunday, May 18, 2014

Now that the early little bell clematis are passing their prime (excepting Clematis koreana and it’s cultivars, which peak now), the Montana Group bursts forth. These are the pink or white, and in some cases double blossoms often described as looking anemone-flowered, or even like dogwoods. A fully in flowering Clematis montana form makes a garden appear as though coated with a heavy layer of cake icing. Many are highly scented, adding the fragrance of vanilla to the impression of frosting. They are confections by any definition.

vera.jpg

At the Rogerson Clematis Gardens, this group is particularly celebrated due to their being amongst Brewster Rogerson’s favorites. In the Founder’s Garden you will find ‘Jenny Keay’ (syn. of ‘Jenny’), ‘Snowflake’ (a fine selection of C. spooneri, a C. montana cousin), ‘Vera’ (pictured above), and ‘Warwickshire Rose’, all in full bloom together. But the rarity in the group is located in the Heirloom Garden, Clematis gracififolia var. trifoliata.

This variant of another Clematis montana cousin came to Brewster via Magnus Johnson, who grew it successfully in Södertälje, Sweden. Our plants are grown in the Heirloom Garden because the species was originally brought out of China and described by Ernest Henry “Chinese” Wilson in about 1910. In general terms, the flowers are smaller than those of the other species in the group.

There are four known variants of C. gracilifolia, according to Christopher Grey-Wilson. It was C. gracilifolia var. gracilifolia first mentioned by Wilson and his colleague at the Arnold Arboretum, Alfred Rehder. Later, in 1980, W. T. Wang and M. C. Chang described another variant, C. g. var. dissectifolia, with finer leaves. This seems to be the form most widely available, when the species can be found at all. A recent collection of C. montana brought back by Far Reaches Farm is quite likely this. It is mainly leaf form and geographic distribution that separate var. gracififolia from var. dissecta. The variant known as macrantha is distinguished by larger flowers and leaves. As regards clematis, Grey-Wilson tends to be a lumper. Magnus Johnson was a splitter, tending to acknowledge distinctions of leaf, flower, and geography as additional variants or even species.

Hence, our plants of what Johnson described in the 2001 English translation of his book, The Genus Clematis, as Clematis gracilifolia var. trifoliata M. Johnson var. nova (or new variant described by himself). He describes it as having purple-tinged stems and new growth, a pink cast to the flowers, and decidedly trifoliate leaves less serrated (if at all) than var. dissecta. He obtained his plants originally from seed collected by Harry Smith in 1935, and all further propagation was done by vegetative cuttings. Therefore, FRCC’s plants are clones of the original seedlings of Smith’s collection No. 12850. Grey-Wilson has lumped var. trifoliata into var. macrantha. We can leave it to our betters to sort this out, but for FRCC’s purposes, we are calling it by the name Brewster received it as, although I can see the reasoning behind melding the two variants. We have not saved seed yet, and so do not know what variations to the variant one might expect. The thing grows frighteningly easy from cuttings, we can say that for a certainty.

gracilifolia-best.jpg

Our best plant of Clematis gracilifolia var. trifoliata is planted on a wire fence on the west side of the famrhouse, in Historic Garden bed C. It is not so heavy a vine as a typical montana, and has flung itself in every direction. It’s most pleasing combination in where it wanders into Syringa ‘Distinction’, a bushy deep violet lilac. The blowsy shrub makes a fine textural contrast with the daintier clematis. We have a another plant receiving more shade on the east side of the farm driveway, in a very exposed site. This second plant is slower to awaken in the spring than its more cosseted cohort, but otherwise shows no ill winter effects.

The Constant ‘Constance’

Posted by LindaB on Sunday, April 6, 2014

constance-copy256.jpeg

And so it begins, the season of flashier flowers than the subtle clematis beauties of winter. Often the first amongst these is ‘Constance’, in the clematis horticultural group known as the atragenes (at-rah-jen-knees). This group contains species such as Clematis alpina, chiisanensis, fauriei, koreana, and macropetala, and are often referred to as the “little bells” of spring. Most have only four sepals, but when the double C. macropetala is involved in the breeding, the resultant hybrids are likely double, too.

Such is the case with ‘Constance’. This culitvar is consistently one of the earliest to bloom in the Rogerson Clematis Garden’s Spring Border. Our specimens, as seen here, clamber though a long hedge of Viburnum tinus. Any pruning of ‘Constance’ is done directly after the first flowers have faded. With a bit of fertilizer added at pruning time, ‘Contance’ will bloom again in August, and will likely produced a modest autumn show in early October.

‘Constance’ is named for the British actress Constance Cummings, and was raised from a seedling of C. ‘Ruby’ by a family friend of Ms. Cummings, Kathleen Goodman of Hull, UK. The plant was introduced to the trade in 1992, and had rapidly established itself as a favorite of this group. The vines can reach 12′ tall if left unpruned, but can be maintained at a more modest 6-8′ with a good tidying, as mentioned above, done directly after the first round of flowering is over.

As if the plant needs further selling points, it would be remiss of us not to mention how very tough the “little bells” of spring are. The winter hardiest of all clematis, Clematis siberica (yes, as in Siberia), takes winters to Zone 2-3. The rest of the species can take winters down to zones 3-4 with little or no damage.

Interestingly, what this group does not like is excessive winter warm. In the humid areas of Zone 8, and in Zones 9-11, all of the atragenes are expensive annuals. Without winter cold to reset their bloom cycle, and in areas where summer temperatures do not drop at night, the plants bloom themselves to death in a year’s time. While we grow ‘Constance’ and her cousins to perfection here in the greater Portland area, in Atlanta, GA, also zone 8, she is doomed to failure because of the summer heat and humidity, which is not factored into USDA zone designations.

However, in Denver, or out on the prairies, or in the high desert areas of eastern Washington and elsewhere, the atragenes will be the most cast-iron of the clematis commonly available for sale.

A Muddle of Montanas

Posted by LindaB on Monday, November 1, 2010

To avoid the risk of losing the logic of my copious notes from the lecture given by tenacious plantsman Christopher Sanders for the International Clematis Society conference on Portland, I will distill them here along with my ruminations and their implications for the Rogerson Clematis Collection (RCC). I use the word “distill” advisedly, as you may feel tipsy after you read all this. Chris’ topic was the Montana Group species and cultivars, and his revelations were just as iconoclastic as his talk on the Orientalis/Tangutica Group in Dublin 2006.

In the Case of the Montana Group, its origins to horticulture are steeped in myth, some of which was sorted in the late Dr. John Howells’ book, The Montanas, in 2004. Chris verifies Dr. Howells’ scholarship, and we can now rest assured that Clematis montana (a white form) was first documented by Buchanan in 1802, not in 1827 as is widely put about. Although common in some areas, Clematis montana var. rubens was not introduced to cultivation in Europe until nearly 100 years later by E. H. Wilson.

Chris limited his comments to taxa in the Montana Group which he had experience of during his years with Bridgemere Nurseries in the UK, or has observed in the wild. He showed a terrific form of Clematis montana subsp. praecox var. praecox which has bright red filaments and connectives (if you look closely at the anthers of any clematis, you will see that the anthers have two lobes held together by tissue known as a connective) contrasted by bright yellow pollen. I do not believe this taxon has ever been in the RCC, but it is a sharp-looking flower, to be sure. He also showed an intriguing image of C. montana subsp. montana with a noticeable pink bar on the reverse (outside) of an otherwise white flower. The RCC does have a close cousin of the species montana, in C. gracilifolia, which has earlier, smaller flowers. The pictures of these three species variants were taken in 1993.

Clematis gracilifolia

In 1995 Chris was again in China, in a nearly subtropical region of southeast Tibet, in an area noted for deep sheltered gorges. There he saw Clematis montana subspecies montana var. sterilis, with slender sepals, from pink buds leaving a pink reverse on the open flower. This taxon has very pointed foliage. He also saw a C. montana subsp. montana var. grandiflora form with a distinctly picotee edge (an outline) of pink on a large white flower. This coloration grew more pronounced as the flowers aged. The foliage was also distinct, the leaves having tufts of five to six leaflets, with entire margins free of any serration.

Clematis grandiflora

Chris commented that the newest edition of The Flora of China calls Clematis montana subsp. montana var. grandiflora, var. longipes instead now, but if he mentioned why, I didn’t catch it. Perhaps clematis registrar Duncan Donald will be able to answer that for us. He also noted that the Flora describes C. tongluensis (another Montana cousin, which has never yet flowered in the RCC), has very slender sepals, and brown anthers on white filaments. This is something to look forward to if we can keep it alive!

At last Chris waded into the deep end of the confusion surrounding Clematis spooneri, C. chrysocoma var. serricea, and C. montana var. wilsonii. Hold onto your hat. There has been general agreement for years that C. chrysocoma, while often seen and photographed by modern botanists in China, is not in wide cultivation, so there is no great movement of the earth there. However, Chris contends that in the current market, plants sold as C. spooneri or its synonym C. chrysocoma var. serricea are actually Clematis montana subsp. montana var. grandiflora (or var. ‘Grandiflora’ if you wish). This is the sort of revelation that causes clematis curators to awaken with the yips in the night. In the RCC we have both C. spooneri and C. m. subsp. m. var. grandiflora, so I will be observing both carefully in April and May of 2011.

Clematis 'Jenny'

The mother of all muddles is the confusion surrounding Clematis montana var. wilsonii. Most of the cultivated plants available with this name are incorrect, either due to a name switch at some earlier time, or because open-pollinated seedlings were sold as a sure thing. Chris has identified four characteristics which must be present to correctly call a clematis “var. wilsonii“. First, as originally described, var. wilsonii had little or no fragrance. That’s right, read it again: little or no fragrance. Now doesn’t that knock you hat in the creek? These days the heady aroma of hot cocoa is said to be the hallmark of thia taxon, but no, that is not how E. H. Wilson experienced the type specimen in the wild. Secondly, it must flower well after the other Montana Group members, not just a little later than the other white forms. C. montana var. wilsonii starts flowering in early July at the earliest. It may continue randomly flowering until late September.

The final two criteria for a true var. wilsonii are an otherworldly boss of stamens nearly as long as the sepals and puffed out like an angry cat. Lastly, the foliage is unusually bullate (lettuce-like), with deeply incised veins which are raised on the underside of the leaves. Brewster and I have long felt that the Clematis montana var. wilsonii of horticulture is not right, more because of the timing of the bloom than for any other reason. However, the RCC boasts two plants, separate collections by Dan Hinkley in the same area of west Sichuan where Wilson made his collections, that just may be the real thing. In fact, I am so confidant that the specimen we have growing in Rosa moyesii ‘Geranium’ is right that I dashed out after Chris’ talk and took cuttings. Our second likely contender fully occupies that last row (18 feet) of the test garden, and will be closely observed in 2011.

Mont 'RubSuperb'2.jpg

Chris stated that Clematis montana var. wilsonii ‘Peveril’ shows very little difference from var. wilsonii. Most of us who have this plant got it through Exuberant Gardens, the clematis nursery of Dorothy and David Rodal, in business in the late 1990s through 2001. Chris Sanders was able to see the Rodal’s plant, still in a fair amount of bloom on September 13, 2010, and make a positive identification: little scent, fancy leaves, fancier stamens, and continuous bloom from mid-summer onward. Their plant of var. wilsonii, however, has an immodest amount of scent.

Clematis 'Fragrant Spring'

A couple of final notes: the plant Roy Lancaster brought into the trade as Clematis spooneri or “the Chrysocoma Hybrid” had pale pink, not white, flowers, and slightly hairy leaves. Here in the U.S. this clematis seems to have dropped out of commerce. And most disturbing to me, Chris reports that Clematis montana ‘Continuity’ has pink flowers with long pedicels, a long period of bloom, and a bold crown of stamens with bright gold anthers and pollen. Sadly, the RCC plant is clearly misnamed, with white flowers and foliage distinctive with a pale variegation highlighting the mid-vein of the leaves. What the devil is our plant?

Ever notice about plant experts that they can muddy the waters yet calm them at the same time? If Chris Sanders weren’t such a thorough scholar and erudite lecturer, one wold be tempted to be annoyed with him. However, the genus Clematis is, in fact, blessed that have a plantsman in our midst who is willing to take on the years of sloppy nomenclature and get it sorted. Now if we could just get the commercial growers to take more care, perhaps the gardening public would feel less intimidated by this fascinating genus.

Next Page »